Tag: 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum

Getting Humans to Mars Dependent on Public-Private Collaboration, Merging Technologiesa

Panelists: Moderator Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of advanced space and launch programs and strategy, Aerojet Rocketdyne; Darby Cooper, senior manager for integrated analysis, Space Launch System, Exploration Launch Systems, Boeing; Steve Jolly, chief engineer for commercial civil space, Lockheed Martin; Jerrol Littles, director of advanced launch vehicle propulsion, Aerojet Rocketdyne; David H. Manzella, solar-electric propulsion project chief engineer, NASA’s Glenn Research Center; Todd May, director, NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center

By Lawrence Garrett, AIAA Web Editor

To develop the propulsion technologies needed for a manned mission to Mars or other human deep space exploration, merging technologies and collaboration between government, private industry and academia are paramount, a panel of experts said July 12 at the 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum in Atlanta.

Panelists in the “Space Exploration Propulsion” session agreed the key technologies that will help enable a mission to Mars are solar-electric propulsion and advancements in chemical propulsion, such as nuclear thermal propulsion.

“Whether it’s electric or some form of chemical propulsion, we think all are necessary,” said Steve Jolly, chief engineer for commercial civil space at Lockheed Martin.

Jolly said Lockheed considers solar-electric propulsion a “key enabler.”

Darby Cooper, senior manager for integrated analysis of the Space Launch System at Boeing, said that even though solar-electric propulsion has been in operation in space for decades, stakeholders now need “to scale it up in size and power to accomplish these human missions.”

Cooper cited NextSTEP, which aims to advance the needed technologies for a functioning cislunar outpost, as one example and said work is also underway to design a deep space transport, a larger transfer vehicle “essentially rated for interplanetary travel.” He noted that such a vehicle will require the efficiencies of a solar-electric propulsion system able to move large masses but also that possesses “a propellant ratio that will be effective.”

“This technology also enables on-ramping of nuclear thermal propulsion, when that technology is mature,” Cooper said.

David H. Manzella, solar-electric propulsion project chief engineer at the NASA’s Glenn Research Center, also stressed the importance of government and industry working together to advance solar-electric propulsion technology and called the investment in solar-array technology “critical.”

Joe Cassady, executive director for space programs at Aerojet Rocketdyne, explained nothing is done without power and that there’s important work being done in that area. For example, he said, NASA is funding the development of larger solar-array mechanisms in order to generate more power.

“This is critical work,” Cassady said, adding that right now the chosen technology is “solar-electric, because that’s the technology that works.”

Todd May, director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, cautioned that the challenges for a manned Mars mission are much greater than those that had to be overcome to get a man on the moon and that new technologies are going to have to be developed.

“There are solutions out there today that we don’t know,” he said, noting that nuclear thermal propulsion is one possible solution. “I think the solution for nuclear thermal propulsion lies in the ability to make a reactor using low-enriched uranium.”

May explained that he thinks that method could reduce some of the activation energy and thus “get that development over the hump and actually get the solution that, from a physics perspective, is a very good solution.”

May also said additive manufacturing will be key and could significantly reduce many of the manufacturing costs that will be associated with deep space exploration.

“I really do think we’ve got a pretty good feel for how we’re going to get to cislunar space,” May said. “But if we’re going to go beyond that, these solutions need to start coming together.”

Video

All 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos

Custom Propulsion Needed for Unmanned Aircraft

Panelists: Moderator Matthew McCrink, Aerospace Research Center, The Ohio State University; Mike Armstrong, vision systems lead, Rolls-Royce North American Technologies; William J. Fredericks, founder and CEO, Advanced Aircraft Co.; Matt Hutchison, vice president of engineering, Aurora Flight Sciences; Jeremiah McNatt, Photovoltaic and Electrochemical Systems Branch, NASA’s Glenn Research Center; Joseph Valenzuela, senior business development executive, Tactical UAS, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions

by Tom Risen, Aerospace America staff reporter (2017-2018)

The unmanned aircraft sector is expanding to meet a wide range of military and commercial tasks, and custom building propulsion for those types of craft could optimize that potential, a panel of executives said July 10 during the “UAS Power Generation and Storage” session at the 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum in Atlanta.

Unmanned aircraft innovation has been driven by developments in electronics, miniaturization or autonomy rather than new propulsion technologies specifically for that market, so that is an area ripe for disruption, said Mike Armstrong, vision systems lead at Rolls-Royce North American Technologies. Armstrong added that the lack of industry standards for propulsion built specifically for unmanned aircraft is one obstacle facing that innovation, especially for electric propulsion.

The type of propulsion needed depends on the task it is built for, considering that size and weight are key factors in making a craft cost-effective, said William Fredericks, CEO of Advanced Aircraft Co. Ability to survey land is key for tasks like precision agriculture, for instance, so the effectiveness of a drone’s battery would help meet the customer’s needs while cutting down the time needed for them to get a return on their investment, Fredericks said.

Designing the aerodynamics of an unmanned aircraft with a specific type of propulsion in mind could help reduce fuel costs and make it more cost-effective, said Matt Hutchison, vice president of engineering at Aurora Flight Sciences.

Lack of a business incentive to attract innovation by top engine providers, however, is a reason that efficient, effective propulsion has been “a major challenge,” particularly for small military unmanned aircraft, Hutchison said.

“It’s just not worth the investment required for them to get into that space,” Hutchison said, adding that advances in electric propulsion could spur investment.

Electric-powered engines could drive down costs for some unmanned aircraft, but they are likely not going to completely replace traditional gas-powered engines on conventional aircraft in the near future, Hutchison said. Electric aircraft will likely be most competitive in “niche applications” like urban mobility with vertical takeoff and landing craft as discussed during the Uber Elevate summit in April.

“This is competing against non-consumption, not competing against established players,” he said of the ability for electric-powered aircraft to meet such niche services.

Video

All 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos

Convergence of Existing Technologies Propelling New Era of Aviation

Speaker: Rafael A. Garcia, director, Propulsion Directorate, Air Force Materiel Command

By Lawrence Garrett, AIAA Web Editor

The convergence of existing and rapidly advancing technologies has set the stage for a 21st century industrial revolution and a new era in aviation, said Jaiwon Shin, associate administrator for NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate.

During the “New Era of Aviation” session July 11 at the 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum in Atlanta, Shin noted the 20th century was host to three industrial revolutions: steam power and electrical power; the division of labor and mass production; and the digital revolution. He said all brought and continue to bring tremendous societal benefits.

The major difference with 21st century innovation, Shin said, is that many of the disruptive innovations today are not the result of one leading technology but rather the result of the convergence of existing, disparate technologies. One such example is drones.

“If you look at [drones], there was no new invention,” Shin said. “All of those technologies existed before drones came to the world, so that’s the very big distinction and unique characteristic in the 21st century innovation.”

Shin cited the smartphone as another example of 21st century innovation.

“Some smart people started pulling these disparate technologies together, and voila, you have a smartphone,” he said.

Shin said it’s important for members of the aviation industry to really start thinking about this concept of the convergence of technologies, noting that although the aviation industry has always served as “the pinnacle of modern engineering and science,” it could benefit by capitalizing on what other industries are doing.

Tesla is one example of a 21st century innovative company, Shin said, because it works in multiple sectors and has a clear mission involving sustainable energy. Shin said that in looking to the future, innovative organizations will succeed not necessarily with products but, like Tesla, with a clear mission and core technology.

Manufacturing is also important, Shin said, especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence and automation and the potential impact of those innovations.

“A lot of people are talking about AI and robots and so on,” he said. “Well, who’s going to make robots, and who’s going to make chips going into all that?”

Shin maintained that sustainable and profitable innovation requires manufacturing, adding that additive manufacturing is going to make it that much easier to manufacture a multitude of designs.

Ultimately, the convergence of technologies and learning from different industries is critically important, he said.

“There is enough innovation using convergence of technologies, and that’s what I’m presenting that we should in the aviation industry as well — not just dwelling in what we have and holding onto what we have, but building upon what we have and moving into the next phase of aviation,” Shin said.

But, he cautioned, the industry needs to be leading the charge.

“The aviation industry needs to be in the driver’s seat to open up this possibility,” Shin said. “We don’t want to be in the passenger seat, or worse yet, in the backseat, and watching IT-based companies opening up this world. Our industry should be leading the pack to bring this revolution in aviation.”

Video

All 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos

Bending the Cost Curve Could Sustain Military Aviation’s Edge

Speaker: Rafael A. Garcia, director, Propulsion Directorate, Air Force Materiel Command

By Lawrence Garrett, AIAA Web Editor

For the U.S. to sustain its long-standing level of excellence and its global edge in military aviation, propulsion costs must go down as readiness increases, said Rafael A. Garcia, director of Air Force Materiel Command’s Propulsion Directorate.

During the “Military Propulsion Needs” session July 10 at the 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum in Atlanta, Garcia explained that downsizing in recent years has left the U.S. Air Force at its lowest personnel levels ever but that the service is still tasked with more missions.

“The U.S. Air Force has global commitments, every day, in every part of the world,” Garcia said. “Whether it’s flying refueling missions, whether it’s flying humanitarian missions, whether it’s supporting current theater of operations, we are a global force. We’re everywhere, every day, at all times.”

Garcia said the key to achieving the Propulsion Directorate’s mission of developing, acquiring, testing, fielding, sustaining and modernizing leading-edge aircraft engines for the Air Force and international partners is in life-cycle management, or the development of an initial concept from beginning to end.

However, he explained the Air Force can’t do it alone and that success is dependent upon key stakeholders and collaborators, including partners at the Air Force Research Laboratory and Air Force Sustainment Center and within industry.

“Industry brings to us a large level of innovation that at times we’re not able to tap into,” Garcia said. “We know that there’s a role in technology, that technology infusion that we can bring in that will leverage the process improvements we’ve made to continue to drive down our costs, to get the cost-effective readiness that we want to achieve.”

According to Garcia, only 2 percent of the Department of Defense’s current propulsion budget goes toward science and technology development. He said materiel serves as the largest sustainment cost driver, taking up 85 percent of the Air Force’s propulsion systems budget.

“It’s not labor; it’s not overhead; it’s materiel,” he said. “Technology can bend the cost curve.”

Garcia noted there are a number of existing areas of opportunity for private industry to collaborate with the Air Force, including the expansion of inspection capabilities through the introduction of new technologies such as the Advanced Topographical Optical Sensor, Dimensional Inspection and Visual Defect, all of which, he said, may lead to the possibility of eventually reusing previously unserviceable materiel.

“We see tremendous potential here,” Garcia said. “This has the potential to drive a lot of costs down for us. If I can get the inspection cost from $1,000 to $50, there’s many more things I can do with that money than I’m doing today.”

Garcia said that while the Air Force has done a pretty good job thus far at trying to identify some of those key areas in sustainment, he’s confident further collaboration with private industry can more rapidly bring about the needed new technologies.

Video

All 2017 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos