Tag: Tom Markusic

Advancements in Propulsion and Energy Are Changing the Name of the Game

Panelists: Moderator Janet Kavandi, director, NASA’s Glenn Research Center; Jay Littles, director of advanced launch vehicle propulsion, Aerojet Rocketdyne; Tom Markusic, co-founder and CEO, Firefly Space Systems; James Maughan, technical director of aero-thermal and mechanical systems, GE Global Research

By Lawrence Garrett, AIAA Web Editor

Ongoing technological advancements in the propulsion and energy sector are spurring and enabling game-changing impacts on the aerospace industry as a whole and are sure to keep the future of propulsion and energy bright, a panel of experts said during the “Game Changing Developments in Propulsion and Energy” session July 26 at AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2016 in Salt Lake City.

“Today, I don’t think we’re really short of good ideas to have game-changing effects,” said Tom Markusic, co-founder and chief executive officer of Firefly Space Systems, noting that what the industry is short on is “game-changing execution.”

Markusic said that there already exists many good ideas in propulsion and aerospace technology that have never been implemented. He suggested that the industry could do a lot if it implemented some of those ideas.

He said Firefly used “old ideas” in the design of its first flagship vehicle, Alpha — specifically the aerospike engine.

“Aerospike engines have been studied for half a century since they were identified as an effective means of nozzle and altitude compensation,” he said.

The goal, Markusic said, was to design a simple, low-cost launch vehicle, which required older technology that he thinks in some ways will be “game-changing” moving forward.

Jay Littles, director of advanced launch vehicle propulsion at Aerojet Rocketdyne, said the idea of leaving Earth, going beyond and attempting to become an interplanetary species is game-changing in its own right.

Littles noted that there are already a tremendous number of technology developments that are changing the way business is being done now and those will define what our near-future will be. He mentioned cross-propulsion, electric propulsion and nuclear-thermal propulsion.

Noting a specific benefit of this advancing technology, Littles said that with a “happy marriage” between advanced electric propulsion and nuclear-thermal propulsion, hardware could be pre-positioned in space for future missions using electric propulsion, while nuclear-thermal propulsion could then be used for the manned portion of the mission into deep space.

Littles also mentioned the significance and impact of the development of the commercial space industry in recent years.

“It’s changing the way we’re doing propulsion development,” he said.

James Maughan, technical director of aero-thermal and mechanical systems at GE Global Research, said that some of the propulsion technologies that GE has been focused on in recent years may not be game-changing but certainly have progressed over the years. He pointed to GE’s LEAP engine, the only one certified for Boeing’s 737 MAX.

Maughan said that there have been enormous technology advances in this engine — “too many to list,” he said — but highlighted the engine’s 3-D-printed fuel nozzles and advances in materials technology.

“These advances in aviation directly poured over into our power business,” he said.

Speculating on the future, Maughan suggested that other propulsion technologies, such as open-rotor propulsion, could be “huge” and could be a leap to a new technology growth curve.

The panelists were all optimistic about the future of the propulsion and energy sector and how game-changing technologies continue to rapidly change and advance the industry.

“None of us can see the future,” Maughan said. “None of us knows for sure what’s going to happen, but from where I sit at GE … I think the future for us and for our industry on both the power side and on the propulsion side is very bright.”

Video

All 2016 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos

Reusable Space Systems Are Obtainable

Panelists: Moderator Dan Dumbacher, professor of engineering practice, Purdue University; Doug Bradley, chief engineer of advance space and launch, Aerojet Rocketdyne; Ben Goldberg, vice president of science and engineering, Propulsion Systems Division, Orbital ATK; Jim Paulsen, vice president of NASA programs, Aerojet Rocketdyne; Gary Payton, distinguished visiting professor, U.S. Air Force Academy; Tom Markusic, co-founder and CEO, Firefly Space Systems

By Duane Hyland, AIAA communications (2008-2017)

Reusable space systems are the holy grail of space technology, according to a panel of experts who spoke July 25 at the 2016 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum in Salt Lake City, and thankfully, unlike the Holy Grail of myth, they said these systems are obtainable.

Gary Payton, distinguished visiting professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy, told the standing-room-only crowd at the “Launch Vehicle Reusability: Holy Grail, Chasing Our Tail, or Somewhere in Between?” session that the idea of reusable systems started with Wernher von Braun, who once proposed establishing reusable components to withstand 950 launches to place crews on Mars. Payton pointed out that the X-33, X-34 and X-37 all showed that reusable systems are possible.

The panelists agreed that reusable systems — especially from the perspective of liquid engine technology — wasn’t a question, but rather, as Doug Bradley, chief engineer of advanced space and launch at Aerojet Rocketdyne, put it “an inability.”

Bradley explained that the 113 years of aerospace were reason-driven.

“People needed reasons to build faster and more capable systems, a need to move mail or cargo or passengers faster and farther than before,” he said, adding that reusable systems are the same. “People will need to explore space more cheaply, so things will go reusable.”

Issues that factor into reusability, according to the panelists, include high reliability of components, lost cost of component manufacturing, high launch volume, and design of systems and components. The more you launch, the more reliable your components, they said, adding that the better your designs, the more likely true reusability will occur.

Ben Goldberg, vice president of science and engineering for the Propulsion Systems Division at Orbital ATK, cautioned, “Reusability is neither good nor bad, but you really need to look at each vehicle and each mission.”

He said in some missions, reusing systems may not make sense due to costs and mission needs.

Other factors impacting reusability include launch type (e.g., ground or air), mission type and environment that the systems would be returning to (e.g., ocean or land).

Reusability in space systems is at a crossroads, but the panelists predict a bold turn down the road toward greater and greater reliance on reusable systems, making the goal of cheap and dependable spaceflight a reality.

Video

All 2016 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Videos